TGNWG » Front Page | RSS
TheGoodNamesWereGone.com
Jun
10

Lousy Blogger

*Sigh* - I'm just having too much fun on Twitter ...

In the mean time, behold what's coming:

Written by Chris Webb @ 05:09 PM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Feb
21

Website CPR: The Plan

In order to fix the marketing atrocities commited against Operation Happy Hour, I've devised a high-level plan for the steps I plan to take on the road to recovery. Call it a "Website Rescue & Recovery Stimulus Plan," if you will.

Click to bigify:

Stage 1: Fix Lunacy

Having let the site slide for over a year, some things have stopped working, there are numerous bugs and multiple basic, usability issues. These need fixing first - it's a waste of time promoting if shitty issues turn users away at the first page view (unless they leave via an Ad of course ).

Stage 2: Populate Forums

Worse than bugs, the site resembles a bad case of city planning (shit loads of new office space and no tenants) - there are numerous features that only "work" when populated with active users, of which the site has none (the bounce rate is currently 97%). Visibly empty forums exascerbates the lack of participation  - a vicious circle - if no one's participating, why stick around?

Populating forums serves two purposes - it starts to form a community around the site, which is very important later on, and creates the appearance of "popularity" through active participation. Happy forum users are not particularly good for Ad revenue, but that's irrelevant - a loyal who doesn't click on ads is worth much more to a site than any ad revenue they may generate over time.

Since I don't have (a) the time and (b) the motivation to spend every day spoon feeding the forums, I've been working on an automated solution to populate semi-interesting content - a strategy that will quickly increase the post count (an important metric for would-be community members in early days) and most importantly, create a reason for discussion. The existing forums are a joke - self serving non-entities which offer no purpose to users. If I sound like I'm self flagellating, I'm not really - I never spent more than a few minutes on the forums originally.

With content going in on a regular basis, the next step is to attract people to look at it. Existing site traffic is all well and good, but I have a (for the time being secret) plan to promote a piece of viral content as a means to focus traffic on the forums.

Hopefully, an increase in traffic will create participation from more than just me (oh the shame) which leaves one last strategy to get the forums buzzing - competitions. I've thought about these a little, they'll basically be half decent prizes for users who contribute interesting content into the forums. 

If I get to the end of all the that, I hope the forums should have a life of their own by that point.

Stage 3: Broaden Reach

The currently survives under the tryanny of Google - 97% of all traffic, and 100% of (albeit insignificant) revenue. Whilst I don't really care short term, this can be addressed in a couple of ways. Providing access to the useful service the site offers on different platforms should hopeful create a new avenue of discovery for would-be users.

The plan is simple - a simplified version of the site formatted for both stand-alone desktop and the iPhone. Without giving too much away at this point, both these platforms provide some virtually "free" marketing capabilities that should increase overall traffic, in bounds links, and thus authority for subsequent search engine indexing.

Stage 4: SEO, PR, Promotion

This may be a mistake, but I don't intend to embark on significant Promotional and Link Building activities until the site is at a point where it's worth promoting. I think it would be a waste to gain a flood of traffic from viral campaigns or otherwise, for visitors to arrive at the site in it's current condition. This isn't strictly a fourth stage though - I will start promotion of the Viral content and iPhone / Desktop solutions as soon as they are ready.

Much work lies ahead

I have no timeline in my head for the above. I'd love it all done tomorrow, I'm not sure if 6 months is even realistic. I'm nearly done with fixing stupid bugs (1) and almost ready to go on automating content to the forums. Once that's going, it's time for the Viral campaign, which I'm really looking forward to.

Stay tuned for more ...

Written by Chris Webb @ 02:45 PM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Sections: Viral & Social Media, Marketing Strategy, Business Model
Feb
16

Website CPR: Quick Update on Google Analytics results

If you read the last post, I finished off with a whole bunch of actions to implement based on some insights from Google Analytics.

Early days, but the results have started to show....

AdSense optimisation on key pages

This has worked immediately. Google has been continually increasing traffic to the site on a linear basis since November, but AdSense revenue has more than doubled and on some days quadrupled over revenue in January. There's probably more room for improvement, but it's a good start. I'll revisit this again when traffic levels are higher and I can see more notable differences between changes to each page.

Keyword optimisation on key pages

I've implemented changes to pages to align to my findings, additionally, I've built a custom solution to generate dynamic Sitemap files for Google's indexing pleasure, these are registered now and Google is slowly crawling through them. Time will tell on this one.

Stay tuned for the next article - the master plan!

Written by Chris Webb @ 07:39 PM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Sections: Search
Jan
23

Website CPR: How Google Analytics can help with SEO

The top searches on Google that refer to your site can tell you a lot about your content, what people are looking for and where you can optimise pages and grow traffic. 

"Go Where The Mushrooms Grow"

Farmers of ye'olden days would seasonally rotate their crops from one patch of land to another, working on the basis that the fertility of each patch of land suited certain crops depending on the nutrients extracted and returned by the previous season's crops. However, where farmers hoped that a certain patch of land would bear fruit (or Veg/Grain), they sometimes found that another area unexpectedly proved better...
 
The lesson here is don't "tender" to parts of your website that aren't reaping you traffic, use what Google Analytics tell you to optimise what's already working. People start businesses on assumptions, ideas, hopes and available research; when you get going and find out your assumptions were wrong, you have to change your game plan and adapt to the opportunities the market presents.
 

Focus Shift.

My top searches (i.e. Google Searches that sent me organic traffic) are below:
 
 
They're a motley crue of terms (not all of which are shown), which on first glance are not overly informative to me, however, look deeper and there's some great trends I can take advantage of to try to increase the woeful levels of traffic to OperationHappyHour:
 
  • Chat.
    Searches for localised chat from places as far fetched as "Palestina," "Kibris," "Krasnodar" and "Bijeljina" are sending me a significant proportion of traffic (I have a chat room for every city in the world). Unfortunately, ALL of these chat rooms are empty (more on that idiocy later), but traffic is traffic, and even though these visitors will mostly leave immediately, I can do something with them....
  • [Insert Bar] + [Insert City]
    A lot of people search for a venue by typing in the name, immediately followed by the city it's in. This makes perfect sense - if there are hundreds of Pubs named "The Royal Arms" in the world, it stands to reason that you would laser-target your search this way. My venue pages already take good advantage of this with the Venue's title and location in the URL, Page Title and Page text.
Now, as useful as those insights are, it's more interesting to understand the value of those keywords and what other keywords are not "bearing fruit" (i.e. Clicks).
 
To do further analysis, let's hop over to Google's Fantastic Keyword Tool
 

"I know Kung Fu"

Having exported the Top 100 searches from Analytics, I then pasted these straight into Google's Keyword Tool (not all shown, ordered by Search Volume):
 
 
Again, not a great deal of surprises, most of these terms of low volume / low competition, with a couple of obvious exceptions. It's fair to say at this stage that even though 
the visits I'm getting from some of these searches are low, this is most likely because the site is so low in the SERP's
 

Always check the small print

What's MUCH more interesting on the Keyword Tool is the "Additional Keywords To Consider" section (ordered by relevance) - 
 
 
The top 30 or so suggestions here are a waste of time - ridiculously generic terms with ludicrous competition, however scroll down and you start to find some gems with very low competition, and more importantly, start seeing Search Trends related to your site that aren't connecting ...
 
 

Observations:

  • High Search Volume, Low Advertiser Competition
    There are LOTS of similar terms with a good 2000-8000 searches per month, with mostly ZERO advertiser competition (which can be *partially* relied on for Result count - we'll find out later)
  • pics/snaps/photos/pictures
    A reasonable amount of searches are for variants of photos/pictures alongside the bar name

What have we learnt from this?

With a little digging, Analytics has given me a wealth of information (and ideas) about my visitors, what they're looking for and how I can provide it more closely. Here's the next steps I'll be taking:
 
  • Chat Room Optimisation
    I'm not ready to invest more time in the City Chat Rooms yet (fool's errand without more traffic), but I can at least optimise AdSense on those pages for visitors that arrive on the empty pages (ahh... the sweet smell of clickthroughs in the morning).
  • Venue Search Trend Optimisation
    The [Venue] + [City] phrase combination is a no-brainer, I'll be optimising for this phrase on all the venue pages
  • Picture Keyword Variant Optimisation
    I'm going to optimise for these keywords, but given the current lack of images on the site, I've had a cunning idea for using Google AJAX search to display (almost) related images when a user hits the page.
  • Keywords Ripe for the Taking
    The last take away from this exercise is the High Volume/Low Competition keywords Google has suggested. I'll look into these in more detail in a future post. Subscribe to the RSS feed so you don't miss out.
 
 Coming Next Time: Let's Take A Look At Our Competition...
Written by Chris Webb @ 10:12 AM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Carelessly tagged: Google Analytics, Operation Happy Hour | Sections: Online Marketing, Promotion Quality, Marketing Strategy
Jan
22

Website CPR - Bringing a site back from the dead

Back in the October 06 yours truly dreamt up a silly idea to create a simple website that lists local bars & pubs by their proximity from you, called Operation Happy Hour. Based on your location (set in Google Maps) I figured I could calculate the nearest bar to you and this would be a novel feature...

What should have been a simple directory of bars quickly blew up to feature all sorts of add ons to the idea, including the addition of user generated content - photos from the bar.
 
It's a classic case of over engineering, and having been crammed full of features, went live in April 2007 suffering a severe identity crisis - what does it want to be to users?

Er, Marketing Plan?

Initially I thought the key was "social photography" - get people taking snaps, they put them on the site, share with their friends, ad nauseum. The two main barriers to entry for this were (1) The sheer amount of time for me to pull this off on my own part time and (2) a little website called Facebook came along which decided they wanted to own the business of photo sharing (not that it's by any means unique).
 
Additionally, I figured I could get local venues interested in some free promotion on the site, but even cold calling with a freebie was met with indifference, which goes to show the importance of networks and building relationships.
 

Fuck it.

Disheartened, I figured if I couldn't even promote it by offering to provide a service for free, on a site with next to no traffic and cents of AdSense revenue, it was a waste of time.
 
Whilst this may seem a harsh reaction given all the work I've put in, I realised there were much more lucrative things I could be working on with a far greater ROI, and much less painful marketing strategy.
 
So in October 2007, Operation Happy Hour was left for dead...
 

Time heals all traffic

Over a year later, something interesting (though not surprising) has happened. With literally not a single second of promotion spent on the site, Google has slowly
and increasingly sent more and more search engine traffic to the site, to a point where it is bringing in a small, but consistant amount of revenue, and reasonably 
regular stream of users.
 

Let's fix this shit.

Given my shocking lack of updates to this blog (TGNWG), I figured I could kill two birds with one stone by using the lots-of-problems-to-fix site (Operation Happy Hour) as a case study, documenting everything I do to get it off the ground. 
 
Whilst I had initial goals for the site, I'm now interested in simply growing traffic through non-painful methods and trying to claw a little revenue back to cover off my initial investments. In effect, I don't really care what happens to the site, so I'm willing to take a cavalier attitude to promotion exercises - risky moves are on the table . Hopefully, if it ends up getting a big fat Google bitch slap, at least we'll learn something on thie blog.
 

Website CPR

I'll post the activities I'm conducting regularly, all laid bare for you to copy. Stay tuned to the RSS feed, first step to resuscitation will be up shortly!
Jan
20

What does the future hold?

 I'm not sure I'm cut out to wear the label "blogger" - it's not that I dislike the associated routine, or any other attribute attached to the label, it's just as a developer I cannot drag myself away from code long enough to pen articles.

What's a Techie to do?

Truth is, I'm working on some software that will make this blog, and many others, extremely easy to update regularly with great content. It's not a "PLR ripper" or eZine regurgutation engine either. This thing is one of a kind.

It's REAL hard motivating myself to spend lots of time on articles when I know once this thing's finished, things change completely.

Hopefully a prototype is ready within the month.

Meanwhile, I'll try harder to put some more cool stuff up ...

Written by Chris Webb @ 09:39 PM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Nov
11

TGNWG Changes Host = EPIC FAIL

So, I was paying over the odds for web hosting and decided to switch hosts. After some research I went with a host (which will remain unnamed at this point) who so far have managed to clock up a pretty respectable list of uselessness:

  • Claimed the VPS would be ready within 2 hours. It took 2 days
  • Within ONE DAY of the hosting being made available, it went down
  • Failed to respond to TWO support calls within 24 hours, meaning the hosting had then been down longer than it had been up
  • Once I got past being put on hold, the support guy said they had "no idea" why my VPS couldn't come back up
  • Are now ignoring my requests for a refund under their 30 day money back guarantee

Suffice to say, this fiasco has taken more time to deal with than I'd hoped, so my overlap window with my previous host ran out, hence TGNWG being off air.

I'm back now courtesy of Web24 in Australia, who have some happy customers over at whirlpool.net.au which swung my vote ("yes we can"). So far all good, we'll wait till we've had a couple of "shared moments" on support calls before I make judgement though 

Normal service resumes ...

Written by Chris Webb @ 10:39 PM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Carelessly tagged: hosting, mistakes
Nov
03

7 Simple Techniques to Change the Quality of your Search Results Forever

Having used search engines since 1995, I can say from experience that the advance in technology has been tremendous, both in terms of search engine technology, and of course the sheer volume of content that has been published over the last 15 years online.

I've changed as a "searcher," and now find myself near a real sweet spot - I can find almost anything I want. If it's online, I'm pretty confident I can find it, and more to the point, find it quickly.

The other changed I've noticed is that I hardly ever go to a specific site to search of locate content on it - Google does a far better job. The simple addition of "site:www.whateveritis.com " before your query will locate the item on the site in question far quicker for two reasons - Google's search servers have insanely high availability/performance and most importantly, Google knows more about your site's content than you do.

With an increasing reliance on Google, it's important for me to learn the best ways to use it - to get results quickly, and filter out noise. Here are 7 techniques I use all the time...

1. Think like a publisher

When you get stuck with searches, try to think like a blogger or publisher, and pretend you are going to write an article that satisfies the query in mind. What words would you use? what phrases and background information might be attached to the information? As you do this, you'll hopefully think or other search terms to try that could lead to the information you are after.

2. Pretend you've already asked the question

Another classic way to get results is to type the question directly into google, without quotes. For example, if you were trying to find honest reviews of a product (typical query: "[product name] reviews"), you could see if there were any forums talking about the product, usually starting with a member asking a question such as:

  • Does anyone have/own a [product name]?
  • Has anyone bought a [product name]?
  • What is [product name] like?
  • What are your thoughts on [product name]?

With a few more variations, you'll hopefully find a blog post or forum thread which is rich in conversation about the product. This works even better for more technical questions, e.g.

3. Focus on the most important words first

Ideally, your search should start with one or two pretty specific words that are at the heart of the query, and then add further slightly less specific words depending on what come back. For instance, say I wanted to find out about whether I could add my blog's RSS feed to my Facebook news feed. I'll start with:

RSS Facebook "News Feed"

Results are all relevant, but their about consuming the newsfeed as RSS. Let's try - 

RSS Facebook "News Feed" add

Not much better, but a lot about FriendFeed. I'm going to remove FriendFeed and add Blog - 

RSS Facebook "News Feed" add -friendfeed blog

Still not much better, but on page two I see the magic words: "... syndicate on your Notes... " At this point, I'm changing my query completely to:

Facebook blog notes syndicate

And at this point, virtually all the results are about importing your blog to Notes within Facebook, which will show up in the newsfeed - the result I wanted.

4. The Expand / Contract method

This is a pretty basic but powerful technique. Following on from focusing on key words (3), incrementally add more and more words or phrases to the search to filter the list down. As the results filter down, take off ones that are bringing more irrelevant results, or change too-specific words to variants that may yield broader results.

5. Research alternative vocabularies

There's always a possibility that the keywords you are using to search for something may differ from those used in online communities. This isn't just misspellings, which Google is getting better at handling, but people referring to the exact same things with completely different words, for example "Website Management" might mean "Content Management," "Plasma" might mean "High Def" and "Code Library" might mean "Framework"

The quickest route around this is to visit forums around the subject matter and observe the lingua franca. An even quicker method is WikiPedia, which may expand on terminology and suggest new keywords that may be valid.

6. Learn Advanced Operators

Google offer a range of advanced operators to instruct it's search algorithm to do more specific searches, including only searching certain sites, searching link text and more. These are invaluable and worth printing out - you can read about these on Google here - 

Google Advanced Search Operators

7. Use "Quotes" liberally

I rarely do a search without quotes involved. If two words logically go together - quote them. If they don't, avoid them, but it's illogical to let Google throw back thousands of results when you can guide it much more explicitly with what you want. There are some unobvious exceptions to this if you're not getting results. "Barack Obama" is a good example - there will be as many references with just "Obama" as well as his full name. "Content Management" is a logical example of something that should always be in quotes.

Take your searches to the next level

Getting more from your searches in less time isn't rocket science - it's essentially just using a little creativity and persistence when searching.

If you've got any stunning tips on searching, please share them below ...

Written by Chris Webb @ 04:06 AM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Carelessly tagged: Google, Search | Sections: Search
Oct
30

Linkbait Articles Series 1. - Forms of Successful Linkbait

The list below contains the most common types of successful link bait. Note that any one of these can and will often co-exist, and indeed the more of these categories a given Linkbait artefact exhibits, the more successful it is likely to be - if one form doesn't create the motiviational condition in a person, another might.

This raises another important point - each of these factor's effects are specific and different to each person exposed. For example, what might be "Exclusive" or "Uniquely Informative" to me, may be old news to you. Thus, presuming you and I have the same dispositions to linking, I would be far more likely to "take the bait." What this means is that you should never assume a strategy will not work because "It's been done before" - that may be the case, but how successful was the example in question? what reach did it have?, can the same information be promoted or recomposed for a different audience?

The Exclusive

An Exclusive covers any information / feature relevant to a given audience. The actual information / feature may be fairly unremarkable, but its value as Linkbait is simply in being the first source of that information / feature, meaning people within the relevant audience are likely reference it. Exclusives have a very short shelf life, and will almost always carry another factor from the list below. Some made-up examples of exclusives:

  • "ISP's to ban all MP3 downloads" (controversial)
  • "John Smith made $10,000 on his blog last week" (uniquely informative)
  • "GMail Inbox upgraded to 2Tb" (brand associated)

Uniquely informative

This is about material that has a meaningful impact to the viewer's worldview - the information educates, enlightens or enrichs their life, gives them new perspectives, etc. But the key difference is the uniqueness - the same old information regurgitated among media outlets and blogs is never unique - this is all about that story or blog post that stands out from the crowd. As covered above, the effect of this type of linkbait will be very different from person to person depending on individual knowledge and experience.

A close cousin to "Useful" (below), Informative can cover much mainstream news and reporting. However, editorial is as much about getting new eyeballs as it is journalism, thus the distortion of fact into hyperbole. The better journalists and independant content publishers who spend time on research and production provide information in a way that captures attention.

Another angle on this is presenting information in a more user-friendly format. There's countless examples of popular information outlets that you could repurpose as an Information Graphic, Video, Slideshow, etc to create a more informing version.

Useful

Useful is any information or resource that will allow the consumer to achieve some with it. To be linkbait though, it needs to stand out, in a big way. Hopefully you find this article "Useful" - but it's unlikely to achieve "linkbait" status. Examples of effective linkbait in this category:

  • A well-presented list of keyboard shortcuts to a popular application
  • The code to crack BlueRay
  • The raft of - "How to [insert skill here] in [insert slightly unbelievable context here]" blog posts littering the web.
  • Software that raises the bar, creates new possibilities / opportunities

For "useful" to work best, it benefits from authority. "How to make/save money" resources barely get noticed unless in the context of an authority. As with Brand Association (below), there's no harm in borrowing credentials to try and make it work "How Donald Trump made $X in his 20's" - I'm sure you can do better than that.

Controversial

Controversy hits the moral and ethical buttons of an audience by challenging their beliefs, sensibilities and opinions via radical means. Although controversy is specific to each audience, it's not hard to imagine material that offends, or would be labelled as inappropriate or questionable by large chunks of the poplation.

Controversy needs to be used with care, depending on what reputational effects you are willing to live with.

Examples include:

  • Any controversial news, e.g. Michael Jackson, O.J. Simpson, social turmoil, environmental decline, etc. Virtually anything to do with politics - which by nature creates opposing viewpoints
  • Prejudiced, hateful or disparaging material, aimed at a subject/target to create an emotional reaction in an audience
  • Material that breaks laws or treads a fine line in legal matters - copyright issues (torrents, DRM, lawsuits, etc) being a current favorite
  • Material that "dupes" an audience - like YouTube's "LonelyGirl15," the first recognised attempt to deliver a premeditated "online video diary" by a young girl, who was actually an actor. A similiar example was the introduction of "Paid Posts" in the blogosphere. Seem like a fuss about nothing now, right?
  • Watch them suffer - Chris Cooper's "Leave Britney alone" YouTube outburst, a seemingly humiliating rant that spread rapidly, along with the numerous "Office worker sex proposal email leaked" examples that make the headlines.

Entertaining

Entertainment covers a wide array of subjects (film, tv, music, celebrities, comedy, books), and on any media (audio, visual, written, graphics, etc.).

Entertainment is subjective, and indeed what some may consider linkbait may simply be the effect of huge marketing budgets for the creators - I don't consider this linkbait. Viral Marketing works very well for certain movies, tv shows, etc; but effective linkbaiting leverages much, much lower promotional costs to achieve far greater return on investment. 

Most of the effective examples in this arena are on YouTube - take a glance at the top rated videos. Most of these are not "studio" produced, and show viewing figures TV networks pay huge sums for.

Innovative

Innovation linkbait is about the message of human progress it communicates or delivers:

  • "Apple announce 1Petabyte iPod"
  • "Microsoft release new Windows version with true 1 second bootup"
  • 50 Inch plasmas now under $300

The greater the advance, the greater the linking.

Brand association

The association of a brand with any information or feature can make it go viral with little other effort. In the case of news, just look at anything Apple does and see the effect. Equally, celebrity "brands" have a perplexing viral quality, as seen in the almost obsessive coverage of Britney Spear's (that's two mentions in this article) every move. It's an interesting reflection on society (that means you and me) that even "mainstream" media catalogs absurdly mundane details about her life, yet this is governed by the perceived interest and "value" of the brand in question - i.e. the knowledge that consumers are actually interested.

For those without an Apple-level brand, an oft-used (and misued) technique is to associate a brand with material in order to leverage a viral effect. Examples of this include:

  • Information Graphic showing every Apple O/S User Interface since they launched.
  • Z-List blogger posts some uniquely derived information about an A-List blogger (very good example was NorthxEast's list of "50 most influential bloggers" which spread like the bubonic plague).
  • Free software that adds value to a brand name service of software, e.g. "GMail Drive" - you'll find these littered on LifeHacker's posts.

"Zeitgeist"

Zeitgeist describes linkbait that defies convention - something that just captures people's attention at a point in time for seemingly unknown reasons. No one would dare put money on it, yet it works. It impossibly risky to create, and can lead to a publicity phenomenom, the effects of which attract more attention. Examples include:

  • Mahir Cagri's "I Kiss You" homepage
  • The Hamster Dance site
  • Lightsaber boy

Realistically, most "Zeitgeist" falls into another category such as Entertainment, but are not usually targeted entertainment - their consumption as entertainment may not have been the intended effect.

Use of Medium

In all the factors above, I've touched on the use of different media - it's a very big factor, which I'll be addressing separately. There is one slant on use of media that is worth mentioning. Certain information lends itself well to different media, but adapting information traditionally consumed in one format to another is a sure-fire way to increase linking chances.

-

To finish up, I'll go for one fantasy linkbait title:

"Google offer dedicated Torrent Search Engine"

That ticks (nearly) all the boxes above - (1) Exclusive: assuming it's the first mention (2) Uniquely Informative: this would be unique, given Google's stature in search technology (3) Controversy: Torrents? 'nuff said (4) Useful: for the target audience, it's very useful (5) Brand Associated: if no one knew the company name, who would care? (6) Use of media: the media in this case, is a software application (service).

The only two I don't think apply in this case are Entertainment and Zeitgeist.

Written by Chris Webb @ 08:37 AM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Carelessly tagged: Link Bait | Sections: Viral & Social Media, Promotion Quality, Marketing Strategy
Oct
29

What is Link Bait? - Article Series

Introduction

Wikipedia defines Link Bait as "any content or feature that somehow baits viewers to place links to it from other websites."

For Website Owners and Internet Marketers, Link Bait is the holy grail - like a great press release, the effect of Link Bait is simple - other people doing high-value promotional work for free. Along with the obvious benefits this form of Viral Marketing brings, an additional bonus is the residual effect on search engine rankings to the website hosting the original material. Put simply, the more links to a given piece of content, the more likely search engines are to list that content in top search result positions*.

Not all Link Bait is commerical or premeditated - content published innocuously can become "link bait" without the publisher even realising it. However, the rest of this article deals with the factors surrounding premeditated Linkbaiting - a term I and others use to describe premeditated attempts to create a link bait effect.

There are essentially two factors to successful Linkbaiting:

  1. Production of content / feature that will create a strong motivational condition for people to share it.
  2. Carefully undertaking enough promotional effort (seeding) to reach a large enough audience of influential people to link to it.

Very simply, the higher the value / quality of the material produced (1), the less initial seed promotion it will need (2). It's a trade off between the cost of the production, cost of seed promotion and the value of resultant traffic / interest.

The Link Bait Series

Over the next few weeks, I'll be publishing a series of articles examing link bait, starting this week. Stay tuned to TGNWG to read the full series, I'll be updating this introductory post with links to all the articles as they are published.

Written by Chris Webb @ 06:31 AM | Comments (0) | Short URL
Carelessly tagged: Link Bait | Sections: Viral & Social Media, Promotion Quality, Marketing Strategy
Subscribe to the RSS Feed
© 2009. TheGoodNamesWereGone.com